Thursday, May 26, 2022
News for Retirees


Pa.’s 2022 GOP U.S Senate main might outline way forward for Social Security, Medicare | Ray E. Landis

Democratic-leaning social media accounts in Pennsylvania had been abuzz this week with information that Republican U.S. Senate candidates Dave McCormick…

By Staff , in Medicare , at April 10, 2022


Democratic-leaning social media accounts in Pennsylvania had been abuzz this week with information that Republican U.S. Senate candidates Dave McCormick and Mehmet Oz had weighed in on the way forward for Social Security and Medicare.

Though it was implied by a few of the extra dramatic accounts, neither Oz nor McCormick known as for dismantling the applications and tossing older People out on the road.

However a more in-depth have a look at their phrases, and the historical past of the Republican resistance to Social Security and Medicare, reveals why advocates for probably the most profitable social welfare applications in American historical past needs to be fearful.

Oz praised the plan supplied by Medicare criminal, U.S. Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, which requires all federally supported applications to require reauthorization each 5 years. Such a coverage wouldn’t routinely get rid of Social Security or Medicare, however it might enable privatization zealots who’ve by no means seen a authorities profit they didn’t need to make a revenue from to require Social Security funds to be invested in a approach which generates income for monied pursuits.

In the meantime McCormick proposed no cuts for present beneficiaries however then acknowledged, “these entitlements will not be sustainable of their current kind.” Whereas we shouldn’t be stunned (however we needs to be appalled) {that a} billionaire hedge fund supervisor would name applications that every one People pay into “entitlements”, he’s not incorrect that Social Security and Medicare want modifications.

Saving Social Security and Medicare means we’d like a fairer, extra sturdy payroll tax | Ray E. Landis

Sadly, as a consultant of the rich class and a Wall Avenue insider, it’s unlikely McCormick would help the logical answer to strengthening Social Security – the elimination of revenue limits on the payroll tax.

With McCormick and Oz the main candidates for the Republican nomination for the US Senate seat being vacated by Pat Toomey, their positions on Social Security and Medicare are vital – not solely to Pennsylvanians, however to the whole nation.

Why ought to supporters of Social Security and Medicare all through the nation be particularly centered on the Pennsylvania US Senate election? The make-up of the Senate reveals how crucial its consequence could also be to the way forward for these applications.

Arizona, Georgia, New Hampshire, and Nevada every have a Democratic Senator up for re-election in 2022. These states are thought to be battlegrounds by Republicans seeking to seize the bulk within the Senate adopted by successful the Presidency in 2024 and enacting their agenda, which incorporates opening Social Security and Medicare to profiteers.

Medicare is headed for a disaster. We’re not prepared – however there’s nonetheless time | Ray E. Landis

This makes the results of US Senate elections in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, two true swing states with Democratic Governors and Republican-controlled legislatures, crucial to those that try to keep up Social Security and Medicare as applications which assist to protect the well being and welfare of the older inhabitants.

The 2022 Senate race in Wisconsin will see Republican incumbent Ron Johnson operating for re-election. Johnson has cratered in polls after changing into a pure right-wing conspiracy theorist, and though he defied expectations to win re-election in 2016 and the Republican-controlled Wisconsin state legislature is doing all it could to suppress the vote this 12 months, Democrats are favored to seize this seat.

Flipping one seat doesn’t go away Democrats a lot margin for error with 4 Democratic-held seats probably in jeopardy in 2022 nonetheless. Which brings us again to Pennsylvania.

The Republican main race in Pennsylvania will not be solely about McCormick and Oz, as 5 different candidates are additionally on the poll, together with two with vital monetary assets, Jeff Bartos and Carla Sands. However McCormick and Oz lead the polls, are exhibiting a willingness to spend wildly on the race, and are more and more centered on attacking one another as not being sufficiently Trump-like.

Ought to both McCormick or Oz advance to the overall election we must always count on a change of their marketing campaign rhetoric. Gone would be the enchantment to the fringiest of right-wing voters and the emphasis can be on how radical the Democratic candidate is.

However are the Republican candidates actually solely exaggerating their regressive conservative credentials with a view to enchantment to the more and more right-wing Republican citizens within the main? The actions of Republican elected our bodies throughout the nation, together with the Republican majority within the Pennsylvania Normal Meeting, ought to give anybody who believes this pause.

Republicans present little interest in engaged on any subject in a bi-partisan method. Actually, Republicans who present an inclination to take action are castigated by the vast majority of the occasion. Any proposal on Social Security and Medicare by Republicans can be weighted towards permitting Wall Avenue traders and insurance coverage firms to make billions – on the expense of beneficiaries.

Advocates for Social Security might really feel assured they might cease this type of change as they did when it was proposed by George Bush in 2005. However the political panorama has shifted dramatically since then. Republicans are way more aggressively corporatist, and in most states they not worry being held accountable for his or her actions by the citizens.

However in a swing state like Pennsylvania points can sway sufficient voters to make a distinction. If we actually need the way forward for Social Security and Medicare to be about beneficiaries as an alternative of the potential for income, we are able to show it this fall by rejecting the candidate that emerges from the Republican main scrum and their company backers who’re wanting to get their palms on the funds People have put aside for his or her retirement years.

Opinion contributor Ray E. Landis writes concerning the points vital to older Pennsylvanians. His work seems biweekly on the Capital-Star’s Commentary Web page. Readers might observe him on Twitter at @RELandis





Source link

Skip to content